SALVINI, FONTANA AND VANNUCCI WITHOUT MELLONI MAKE THE CHURCH TRADITIONAL WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL)
SALVINI, FONTANA AND VANNUCCI
WITHOUT MELLONI MAKE THE CHURCH TRADITIONAL WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL)
With Vatican Council II rational, the Catholic Church and the right wing political parties are aligned. With Vatican Council II irrational, the Catholic Church and the left wing political parties are aligned.
With Vatican Council II, rational, the de fide teachings of the Church-before and after Vatican Council II-support the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics. Christ must be King in society, in politics and the legislature of Parlament in Italy.
We follow the teachings of the Catholic Church which have not changed since the times of the Apostles to today ( 2025).
The main line Catholic Church returns to Tradition, without the political left.
Just as it is a priority for the Italians to be given employment instead of non Italian foreigners , in the same Vatican Council II interpreted only rationally must be a priority.
I am aligned with the past Magisterium without rejecting Vatican Council II. It should be the same for the Lega Salvini political party.
The Church cannot change the interpretation of the Council and Catechism for political reasons to create a break, in doctrines, with historical Rome.
The pope who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally must be corrected by the people in Italy. Telling a lie is a sin.
For me the Athanasius Creed is the same.
For Pope Leo there are exceptions. So the understanding of the Athanasius Creed has changed.Cardinal Fernandez does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since it has exceptions in Vatican Council II for him. For me there are no exceptions.
Pope Leo and Cardinal Cupich are not aligned with the pre-1949 Magisterium. They are in official and public schism. They cannot deny it. Vatican Council II for example is a break with the ecclesiology of St. Francis of Assisi for them but not for me.
Bishop Bernard Fellay of the SSPX however interpret invisible cases of Unitatis Redintigratio 3, the Decree on Ecumenism, Vatican Council II, as an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church ( Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX). So he supports the irrational philosophy and theology, the Cushingite theology, upon which is based the New Ecumenism.
Then Bishop Fellay criticizes the New Ecumenism of the liberals.
Based upon the false interpretation of Vatican Council II by Bishop Fellay is based the new theology of the Synods.
Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents like Archbishop Anibale Bugnini. I avoid this mistake.
After some 60 plus years, the language for discussing Vatican Council II has changed. The conclusions are different.
-Lionel Andrades