en.news

FSSPX Bishops Excommunicated - Clergy Declared Schismatic - Confessions Invalid

The Vatican's Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on July 2 issued a decree excommunicating the six bishops of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX).

The decree also warns clergy and faithful not to adhere to the Fraternity's schism, stating that doing so incurs automatic excommunication.

An accompanying explanatory note says that all attempts since Pope Paul VI to reconcile the movement founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre with the Catholic Church have failed.

The recent episcopal consecrations against the will of Pope Leo XIV, it says, "constituted the offense of schism, with the resulting canonical consequences for the sacred ministers and lay faithful involved."

"The sacred ministers belonging to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X are in schism and must therefore be considered schismatics."

Lay faithful who formally adhere to the Fraternity are likewise to be considered schismatics and excommunicated.

The FSSPX clergy administer "the sacraments illicitly": "The sacrament of penance and the marriages they perform are invalid."

The note adds that the Church will welcome with affection those who wish to return to full communion, while Apostolic Nuncios will provide diocesan bishops with procedures for handling individual cases.

The faithful are also urged "to refrain from participating in the celebrations and activities promoted by the aforementioned Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X."

EXPLANATORY NOTE

From the time of Saint Paul VI up to the most recent discussions held at this Dicastery, the many attempts to bring the adherents of the movement begun by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre back into full communion with the Catholic Church have proved unsuccessful. This situation has been further aggravated by the recent episcopal consecrations carried out without a pontifical mandate, against the will of the Holy Father, and in open violation of canon law. Therefore, this Dicastery, in the faithful exercise of the responsibilities entrusted to it, considers it necessary to state that this act has constituted the canonical crime of schism, together with its canonical consequences for the sacred ministers and lay faithful involved. Indeed, as was already declared in 1988, "such disobedience—which carries with it a practical rejection of the Roman Primacy—constitutes a schismatic act" (cf. John Paul II, Apostolic Letter Ecclesia Dei, no. 3).

Accordingly, from this point forward:

Sacred ministers belonging to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X are in schism and must therefore be regarded as schismatics (cf. Ecclesia Dei, no. 5(c); Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, Explanatory Note on the Excommunication for Schism Incurred by Adherents of the Movement of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre, 24 August 1996, nos. 5–6). They are therefore subject to the excommunication prescribed by law (can. 1364 §1 CIC).

With regard to the lay faithful, those who formally adhere to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X under the conditions established in the 1996 Explanatory Note of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts (cf. ibid., no. 7), which remains in force and which this Dicastery hereby adopts as its own, are to be considered schismatics and excommunicated.

Finally, the holy People of God are warned that the sacred ministers of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X administer the sacraments illicitly, and that the sacrament of penance they administer and the marriages at which they assist are invalid.

The Church, as a loving mother, will receive with sincere affection and pastoral concern all those who desire to return to full communion. The Apostolic Nuncios will provide the procedures that Ordinaries may use in the various cases.

Finally, all the faithful are exhorted to remain steadfast in communion with the Roman Pontiff, with the bishops in communion with him, and with the whole Church (cf. Lumen Gentium, no. 22; can. 751 CIC), and to refrain from participating in the celebrations and activities promoted by the aforementioned Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X.

From the Palace of the Dicastery, 2 July 2026

Víctor M. Cardinal Fernández
Prefect

Msgr. Armando Matteo
Secretary for the Doctrinal Section

John J. Kennedy
Titular Archbishop of Ossero
Secretary for the Disciplinary Section

DECREE

Despite the warnings addressed to the Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta, having committed an act of a schismatic nature by conferring episcopal consecration upon four priests without a pontifical mandate and against the will of the Supreme Pontiff, has incurred ipso facto the penalties provided for in can. 1387 and can. 1364 §1 of the 2021 Code of Canon Law (CIC).

Accordingly, I declare, with all juridical effect, that both the aforementioned Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier have ipso facto incurred the penalty of latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.

I further declare that Bishop Bernard Fellay, having directly participated in the liturgical celebration as a co-consecrating bishop and thereby publicly adhered to the schismatic act, has incurred the latae sententiae excommunication provided for in can. 1364 §1 of the 2021 Code of Canon Law.

Clergy and lay faithful are warned not to adhere to the schism of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, lest they ipso facto incur the penalty of latae sententiae excommunication.

From the Palace of the Dicastery, 2 July 2026

Víctor M. Cardinal Fernández
Prefect

John J. Kennedy
Titular Archbishop of Ossero
Secretary for the Disciplinary Section

Msgr. Armando Matteo
Secretary for the Doctrinal Section

#newsXmweoqhmve
241K
Percy Franklin

Very old argument but stands the test. If St. Paul were here which Mass would he attend? Another old argument but immutable, if you defect from any de fide teachings or deny dogma, you are excommunicated. Mr. Fernandez, Mr. Prevost, Mr. Matteo, Mr. Kennedy your table is ready in the smoking section.

V.R.S.

"St. Paul" the 6th? His Mass, of course!

Percy Franklin

St. Paul the 6th, no he celebrates with Henry the 8th! St. Paul the apostle celebrates with Pope St, PiusV

Mike the Pike

Monday June 29, no change. Today July 2, Mainstream Media is talking schism. Who caused the schism? The pope could easily consent to the consecrations. He did not. His globalist predecessor, removed the automatic excommunication from Marko Rupnik (and gave him a parish) after Rupnik abused nuns. Will the globalist Leo bring the SSPX back into communion or will Leo XIV push his globalist-inspired schism?

DefendTruth shares this

The Vatican drops the hammer: • The four new SSPX bishops, along with the two SSPX bishops who consecrated them, are excommunicated. • All SSPX priests are declared "in schism and must therefore be considered schismatics." • All lay faithful "who formally adhere to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X are to be considered schismatics and excommunicated." • SSPX confessions and marriages are declared invalid.

3324
Jeffrey Ade

More like a feather. The Vatican has no hammer anymore.

V.R.S.

@Jeffrey Ade
But they have plenty of hummers. They are humming, humming and no clear, unequivocal word emerges.

john333

Leo removed Co redemptrix and SSPX up held Co redemptrix which side do you want to be on. Rome will lose the Faith become the seat of the anti Christ get behind me Satan

Denis Efimov

Let the trio of heretics, who signed this toilet paper, stick it on their foreheads and wear it. Null and void.

Sandy Barrett shares this

According to the Vatican: As of yesterday, not just the SSPX bishops are excommunicated but also *all* those who continue to adhere to the Society. SSPX sacraments of confession and marriage declared invalid; Catholics may not attend SSPX Masses.

1129
Mike the Pike

LGBT Vatican tells me SSPX is not Catholic. LOL

P. O'B

Doesn't Rome consider the Confessions in the schismatic Orthodox churches to be valid?

V.R.S.

"Rome" today considers "schismatic Orthodox churches" as "Sister Churches" and one of their main leaders as "His Holiness" (cf. Prevost's June 30 audience).
Thus, the above question is out of date.

P. O'B

Maybe the SSPX can become a sister church, or at least a first cousin.

SonoftheChurch

An apostate pornographer can’t excommunicate anybody or anything. It’s a sham….the pot calling the kettle black.

V.R.S.

Oh.
The situation just returns to 1988 (when it comes to argumentation of both sides on validity of ipso facto excommunication and alleged schism) and - when it comes to blind obedience to whatever people in today Vatican are saying: remains just the same as when post-conciliar pope Paul VI tried to impose NOM and erase the ancient and venerable Roman Rite of the Holy Sacrifice of Mass.

Wilma Lopez shares this

The decree labels all SSPX priests as schismatics subject to excommunication and declares that confessions heard by them and marriages they witness are invalid.

160
Mike Paul Smith

Confessions are always valid by an ordained priest, even if he is excommunicated. It just shows how stupid they are.

eva333

A false pope has no divine authority to excommunicate anyone

Mike the Pike

Leo's call for unity is all talk and no walk!

Mike the Pike

hypocritical heretic [shake my head]

Lisi Sterndorfer
Sally Dorman shares this

The Vatican has officially issued a decree of excommunication to the bishops of the SSPX; +Alfonso de Galarreta, +Bernard Fellay, +Pascal Schreiber, +Michael Goldade, +Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and +Marc Hanappier. As regards the lay faithful, those who formally adhere to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X are to be considered schismatic and excommunicated.

281

“Excommunicated" by the porn-man

Dimas Irusta

Now more than ever, I will not only continue to attend the Masses celebrated by the Fraternity and receive the Sacraments it administers, but I will substantially increase my involvement.