POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY MUST NOT INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II DECEPTIVELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS . THE COUNCIL IS TRADTIIONAL
08.01.2026POPE LEO AND THE CONSISTORY MUST NOT INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II DECEPTIVELY FOR POLITICAL REASONS . THE COUNCIL IS TRADTIIONAL
Pope Leo must not confuse implicit cases as being explicit, create a liberal, non traditional conclusion and then say Vatican Council II must be developed and deepened, it is the North Star. This is dishonesty. Invisible people are invisible.
He must interpret implicit cases of LG 8 ,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as not being explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. An ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II must support an ecclesiocentric Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
Pope Leo has not informed the Study Groups at the Consistory that Vatican Council II is traditional, orthodox and exclusivist. It is in harmony with traditional faith and morals. So there cannot be any innovation. Homosexual unions and other LGBT agenda are mortal sins of morals.
CONSISTORY UNETHICAL ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
This is the Councilor Church of which he is the head. This is Vatican Council II rational, magisterial and apostolic. If the Consistory interprets Vatican Council II irrationally then they are immediately in schism with the faith and morals, of for example, the 16th century. There is a rupture with the Church Fathers. There is a break with the Apostles.
The Study Groups at the Consistory must not project invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being visible and known cases producing a liberal conclusion, which is a development of doctrine. This is unethical.
We now know that we have a rational choice in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. It is magisterial and apostolic. The pope and cardinals are obligated to follow it.
With ‘visible baptism of desire ‘(LG 14) Pope Leo has changed the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed too. He makes the Great Commission obsolete and so also traditional ecclesiocentric mission.
The traditional teaching on mortal sin is also made superfluous by him since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church, visible exceptions for the dogma EENS, so people are being saved in their different religions. Protestants and non Christians can be saved in their religion with their faith and morals- and the lack of Catholic values.
VATICAN COUNCIL II MUST BE NON SCHISMATIC
The whole Church is presently in schism since the popes from Paul VI to Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II schismatically instead of non schismatically. There is a rupture with the traditional, non schismatic ecclesiology of St. Francis of Assisi, St. Catherine of Siena and the Early Catholic Church.
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the German Synods is irrational. People now know that they have a rational alternative.
Bishop Michael Olsen at Fort Worth, Texas, USA, interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and deceptively. He did this during the flap with the Fisher More Catholic College in Texas, which was traditional. He did this with the Arlington Discalced Carmelite Sisters. They were laicized. The college was not allowed to have the Latin Mass, whose exclusivist ecclesiology had exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for Bishop Olsen. No canonical appeal was filed against the bishop for heresy and schism and for not accepting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Creeds, etc.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin at the Consistory must inform the Italian Government, the U.S State Department and foreign embassies at the Vatican that Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a hypothetical case. We cannot see or meet someone saved in invincible ignorance. So Vatican Council II (AG 7) has a hermeneutic of continuity and not rupture with Tradition. The Council supports the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano before the schism-trial was supporting a community of cancelled priests and religious, at Viterbo, Italy. That community has to accept a liberal bishop who projects Vatican Council II as a rupture and not continuity with Tradition.
Now Pope Leo and the Consistory are expected to continue to interpret Vatican Council II deceptively and bring the LGBT ideology into the Catholic Church.
ARCHBISHOP JOSEPH KENNEDY
Why is there no trial for schism for Archbishop Joseph Kennedy at the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican ? He refuses to affirm the Creeds rationally, like over the centuries. Instead he projects LG 14 (the baptism of desire) as being an explicit exception for the Athanasius Creed which he rejects. He is in schism on even the Creeds, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442, and the Catechisms on’ salvation outside the Church’. There has been no denial from him since Archbishop Vigano’s trial for schism.
Why had Archbishop Vigano have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and liberally like Archbishop Kennedy and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez? There now is a rational, traditional, apostolic and magisterial alternative, for Catholics.
The Consistory will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and deceptively .Then they will cite the non traditional conclusion. This will be the excuse to bring satanic values into the Church.
How can the cardinals at the Consistory make their official Oath, based upon the irrational version of the Nicene Creed?
The Consistory will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, dishonestly and so non apostolically. So conclusions will be invalid.
How can the Consistory approve Pope Leo who now interprets the Creeds schismatically instead of non schismatically and so traditionally?
There should be a penitential rite at the Consistory for approved homosexual weddings which have no support in an ecclesiocentric Vatican Council II, with traditional faith and morals, opposed to the LGBT agenda. - Lionel Andrades